[driver3]

Differences between the 2.0 and 3.0?

Maybe the price will come down on the 2.0s?

I know I've asked this question before - but for dual sport, this thing works just fine running 60mph for 30 mins right?

Last, can you roll the bike backwards while in gear? I recently rode a yamaha with some version of a rekluse and it would not roll backwards. could have been out of spec or something, but sometimes you need to roll back off an obstacle and re-attempt. This was not possible with his bike.. I had to put it in neutral to roll back. Most things I need to roll back from, you're in a tough situation, off-balance, etc - it's a pain in the a$$ to start shifting and playing games with it (also why I like the e-start). I just want to clutch in, roll back, and restart. Make sense?

[crfsonly]

First, all of the current Rekluse models have manual clutch override so, there's never a time when you can't use your manual clutch to override the autoclutch. Second, the Rekluse makes having to think about clutching a thing of the past. You won't have to worry about pulling in the clutch if your bike comes to a sudden stop. When you want to go just put it in gear and throttle out. The 3.0 is an improved version of the 2.0. More durable and better feel. You can roll it back in gear as long as the RPMS are below the clutch engagement point. No problems with dual sport.