well the fact is that 250 smokers are faster that 450
Listen:
I love two strokes.
You're miles away from being even a little right.
The new MXA has a shoot-out between the 08 YZ250 two and four strokes,
250's.
With it's 10 hp advantage the two stroke beats the four stroke at every start, but guess what their lap times were ? EVEN.
That's because as AS said, the power is easier to modulate, to control, with the thumper.
A
450 thumper vs. a
250 two stroke is no contest with riders of the same ability on a motocross track and not in a 'drag race' either.The 450's are faster, by plenty.
I think two strokes are better in the woods and so will most GNCC types tell you when they're being honest.
I know the thumpers are superior than 2 strokes in motocross and absolutely in cross country stuff.
With the exception of California and their completely wrong and idiotic CARB rules, emissions and the EPA have nothing to do with the demise of two strokes. SALES and the absurd AMA has everything to do with it.
Recently Euro sales of two strokes have surged after their version of the EPA published an 'oops' paper about two strokes not being any worse than thumpers after all. Duh.
Like I said, I love 'em but don't make them something they aren't. Darn near everything you believed is wrong. Doug