djh65 wrote:It's funny. 150 people have looked at this post and only one has had a comment. humm. I guess I'm wrong.
djh65 wrote: There are two things I notice in a different way. First the very poor are republican.
djh65 wrote: Like you say, the Democrats help the poor.
djh65 wrote:I guess you have never been around the poor rednecks. I have had the wonderful opportunity to speak with the great people of clear lake CA. (Where the tooth brush was invented anywhere else it would have been a teeth brush. ) They are poor, living on welfare and scream the praises of the republican party. Like you say My party really does nothing but throw a bone to the bottom of the barrel. But what kills me is this. How many people could get help with the money that has been given back to the ultra rich or the major corporations in the last 6 years? Or as I just heard the 5 billion we are paying Pakistan for the capture of Bin Ladin or the non capture as it stands. The long and short of our disagreement could be easily handled. Flat tax so every person working in American pays their fair share or like one of your boys said at the debate, only a sales tax so you pay on what you spend. And the long overdue welfare reform for the losers on the bottom and the major corporations. I am really thinking about how good a new party could work. I could see you and I voting together to fix this country. We know neither of the two partys will do anything.
revenue is up! Way up! and yet how could that be? Since taxes have been cut only for the "ultra Rich"!
I never met a liberal yet, that didn't get wet at the thought of punishing GM, Haliburton, GE or any other succesful money making enterprise with huge taxes
CBS provided the fewest labels (95) but the worst bias: just seven liberal tags, compared to 88 conservative ones, more than a twelve-to-one skew. NBC, whose three-hour Today spends more time on politics than other morning shows, had the most labels (193), but only 26 liberal modifiers. ABC had the most “balanced” approach — 140 conservative tags vs. 26 liberal labels, a five-to-one disparity.
Dude, you are with out a doubt the epitome of someone with a little knowledge is a dangerous thing,
djh65 wrote:Your right
revenue is up! Way up! and yet how could that be? Since taxes have been cut only for the "ultra Rich"!
Quoted from CBS
"The federal budget was in surplus for four years from 1998 through 2001 as the long economic expansion helped push revenues higher. But the 2001 recession, the cost of fighting a global war on terror and the loss of revenue from President Bush's tax cuts sent the budget back into the red starting in 2002."
"The Congressional Budget Office said that it now expects the deficit for all of 2007 to total between $150 billion and $200 billion. That would be a significant improvement from last year's deficit of $248.2 billion, which had been the lowest imbalance in four years. "
I never met a liberal yet, that didn't get wet at the thought of punishing GM, Haliburton, GE or any other succesful money making enterprise with huge taxes
What's wrong with them paying their fair share? I pay my fair share.
You and your party have been calling it a liberal press for so many years you belive it.CBS provided the fewest labels (95) but the worst bias: just seven liberal tags, compared to 88 conservative ones, more than a twelve-to-one skew. NBC, whose three-hour Today spends more time on politics than other morning shows, had the most labels (193), but only 26 liberal modifiers. ABC had the most “balanced” approach — 140 conservative tags vs. 26 liberal labels, a five-to-one disparity.
Dude, you are with out a doubt the epitome of someone with a little knowledge is a dangerous thing,
You must be looking in the mirror.
What's wrong with them paying their fair share? I pay my fair share.
You and your party have been calling it a liberal press for so many years you belive it.
litigation costs everytime someone like John Edwards wants to sue you using "Junk Science" to line his own pockets and put you and your employees out of business!
djh65 wrote:I guess you had troubles with my quotes, I'll explain.
We have a massive defict, over 150 BILLION. Take all the taxes you want you can't fix that with the cut and spend government we have now.
Like Agent said "The Republicans (my boys) talk a great game about smaller government, and promptly go to Washington and create as big a government as they can without losing the power they have. "
Media,
The tags show which programs are considered liberal or conservative.
The higher percentage means they have more shows pro-conservative not less.
Liberal media was started by the conservatives many years ago with the theory "if you say it enough times people will believe it" It worked with you.
As far as taxes go I too wish I didn't have to pay taxes but someone needs to pay for the government. Unless you can get your fairys to do it.litigation costs everytime someone like John Edwards wants to sue you using "Junk Science" to line his own pockets and put you and your employees out of business!
I forgot there were no Republican lawyers, and they would never do that.
CBS provided the fewest labels (95) but the worst bias: just seven liberal tags, compared to 88 conservative ones, more than a twelve-to-one skew. NBC, whose three-hour Today spends more time on politics than other morning shows, had the most labels (193), but only 26 liberal modifiers. ABC had the most “balanced” approach — 140 conservative tags vs. 26 liberal labels, a five-to-one disparity.
Quoted from CBS
"The federal budget was in surplus for four years from 1998 through 2001 as the long economic expansion helped push revenues higher. But the 2001 recession, the cost of fighting a global war on terror and the loss of revenue from President Bush's tax cuts sent the budget back into the red starting in 2002."
"The Congressional Budget Office said that it now expects the deficit for all of 2007 to total between $150 billion and $200 billion. That would be a significant improvement from last year's deficit of $248.2 billion, which had been the lowest imbalance in four years. "
Once again you are a prime example of someone who talks a lot but only sees what he wants to see and only hears what he wants to hear! if this does not wake you up to your disconnect with reality than nothing will!!!!!!
Dude, you are with out a doubt the epitome of someone with a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but then again you sound and write and argue like most uninformed bleeding heart liberal elitest!!!
Hey where did the job fairy go?
Well, anyone who can't see the total and complete bias of everything but talk radio and Fox news has bigger problems than whats being discussed here so far. How skewed must one's perception be from reality to not see it, or hear it, or taste it, or smell it? It is not exactly subtle.
djh65 wrote:Ok so I might have messed up the tag one. oops. The impressive gain on the deficit is great unless you look at the surplus we had in 2000 which was the last we have seen.
Check my ego. Look at the tone of your posts. They are mean, hateful and condsending. I expect that. Let's hear how you would make it better?Once again you are a prime example of someone who talks a lot but only sees what he wants to see and only hears what he wants to hear! if this does not wake you up to your disconnect with reality than nothing will!!!!!!Dude, you are with out a doubt the epitome of someone with a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but then again you sound and write and argue like most uninformed bleeding heart liberal elitest!!!Hey where did the job fairy go?Well, anyone who can't see the total and complete bias of everything but talk radio and Fox news has bigger problems than whats being discussed here so far. How skewed must one's perception be from reality to not see it, or hear it, or taste it, or smell it? It is not exactly subtle.
And Fox is bias???????
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
Copyright 2016-2017 © CRF's Only Forums. All Rights Reserved.